Jump to content

don't rob farm dealerships


hillman

Recommended Posts

I found this funny although Mallory( I remember the day she was born )  shouldn't have got in front of the get away car. I worked for the Sallans family when they were an Allis dealer. still consider Jeff a friend although he was my boss- still offers me a job when I see him👍 knowing the people involved made it esp funny for me

This week a couple guys tried to rob their dealership 🤣they lost control of their stolen car and hit a skid steer. What you don't see in the video is Jeff ripping a shirt off one of them ( I think that aided the tracking dogs) and the driver hit one of the staff's fist with his face 🤣. he went down and said staff member told him if he tried to get up he would knock his teeth out ( I talked to that employee ) - they dragged him by the leg onto their property .The other 4 were found hiding in a nearby quarry, one shirtless 😀

Let it take a second to load and watch the 2:58 minute video if you want a chuckle

https://kitchener.ctvnews.ca/this-isn-t-going-to-happen-today-staff-at-kitchener-business-recall-how-they-thwarted-attempted-robbery-1.6422896

  • Like 7
  • Haha 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hilly I love it, LOVE IT, enuff of this crap where the bad guys get away with everything, I don't know if the easties are handling the theft problem in a good way, but here westies almost allow the thefts and don't do anything, not becuz of police inaction but the bloody politicos and their liberal ways.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see that several of them had quite a few priors.  Hope they get taken off the street for a while, but I'd hate to bet on it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Dasnake said:

Hilly I love it, LOVE IT, enuff of this crap where the bad guys get away with everything, I don't know if the easties are handling the theft problem in a good way, but here westies almost allow the thefts and don't do anything, not becuz of police inaction but the bloody politicos and their liberal ways.

I live in California, companies would prefer the theft and loss than having someone injured or worse and having to pay out to them or being sued by anybody. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Glad there was a happy ending. Theft is getting out of control and something has to be done. Just had the police in our yard a hour ago wondering if we were missing anything by chance. Apparently a neighbors house that was being renovated was broken into and a bunch of stuff stolen. Every day now I see posts in the area about trucks or quads being stolen.  The one guy had his post shared about a missing sxs.  It showed up 60 miles west of him. People from that local reserve had reported it to him and told him where it was at the moment. Local police didn’t want to go looking for it though.  I haven’t heard if he got it back yet or not.  He said they’ve had in excess of 100,000$ worth of stuff stolen from their yard on the farm farm in the last year. Multiple instances. 
 

The stupid part about the theft your friends had is if they’d hurt them out fearless leader would sooner see the victims in jail then the criminals it seems.  They’ll be out in after a brief stay in the hotel and right back to their old ways. Hopefully not seeking revenge on your friends business. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Jake19917561 said:

I live in California, companies would prefer the theft and loss than having someone injured or worse and having to pay out to them or being sued by anybody. 

I don't understand that thinking, the losses are in the millions, who could sue? Who could be injured? I hope that thinking isnt brought on by the shiitratz suing, becuz if we start worrying about scum than its all over, much to my comment of home invasions in kanknuckigoofystan.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

But places like San Francisco are running out of stores to rob. Most major chain stores are gone. Hurd some smaller stores don't let customers in. You give a list and they bring it to the door. I am not going to drive up and see how they do it ether.

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, poor farmer/logger said:

Glad there was a happy ending. Theft is getting out of control and something has to be done. Just had the police in our yard a hour ago wondering if we were missing anything by chance. Apparently a neighbors house that was being renovated was broken into and a bunch of stuff stolen. Every day now I see posts in the area about trucks or quads being stolen.  The one guy had his post shared about a missing sxs.  It showed up 60 miles west of him. People from that local reserve had reported it to him and told him where it was at the moment. Local police didn’t want to go looking for it though.  I haven’t heard if he got it back yet or not.  He said they’ve had in excess of 100,000$ worth of stuff stolen from their yard on the farm farm in the last year. Multiple instances. 
 

The stupid part about the theft your friends had is if they’d hurt them out fearless leader would sooner see the victims in jail then the criminals it seems.  They’ll be out in after a brief stay in the hotel and right back to their old ways. Hopefully not seeking revenge on your friends business. 

  Motor bike shop 45 minutes away had several trail bikes stolen valued at 60,000 dollars a few months ago.  Created a very serious hardship for the owners.  A lot of businesses require credit extended to them to purchase inventory.  If the cost to the dealer was 35-40 thousand that is how much net revenue they need to generate to offset the loss.  My understanding that even with insurance they are slow to pay then up rates so quite a few businesses are hesitant to put in a claim.  It sounded like in the motor bike shop it was unlikely they had insurance to cover the loss.  I'll try to find out more about that.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So unfortunate that they keep repeatedly running into his fist, hope the dogs had a good time too

Link to comment
Share on other sites

just got off the phone with a friend ,his business uses several order/pay apps (mandated PC necessity)

Seems the dead beat 10yrs past PO is on drugs /hard times. Contacted the payment processor and was having the deposits moved to him.

Bc there is an alert regional rep they called manager to confirm.

po po frequent the store so picked him up

$ is enough,    it is at least felony fraud + a page of other charges,had 2 other active warrants and pages of records.

repeat rapists/murders are let out next day at least 4x, so dont expect much jail time,with no actual costs,.....BUT po po,dont like their donuts messed with.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, hardtail said:

So unfortunate that they keep repeatedly running into his fist, hope the dogs had a good time too

The staffer I was talking with said he thought the thief on the ground was going to have a heart attack 🤣 IMHO a good beating should be part of the deterrent program, Jeff and the boys set out after with an ATV and truck to find the others. I think the other 4 were lucky the police found them💪 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

When we take our countries back it will again be a safer better place to live.

Don't let the 5% of the idiots control the 95% of us.

Fight back!

Great work Connect Equipment!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Dasnake said:

I don't understand that thinking, the losses are in the millions, who could sue? Who could be injured? I hope that thinking isnt brought on by the shiitratz suing, becuz if we start worrying about scum than its all over, much to my comment of home invasions in kanknuckigoofystan.

Jake I believe the thinking is the stores can not instruct their employees to confront thieves because if there is an altercation and the employee is seriously hurt then the store is liable for their injuries. Also there are far to many who if they are injured would sue or their families would. Then you have the thief who more than likely would sue somebody be it the store or employee if they were injured. So from a liability stand point the store is better off (up to a point anyway)  letting them go and calling the cops.

Son works for Walmart and they tell them not to confront people. Same with asking to see a receipt for any thing at the door not in a bag. If customer says no thats the end of it. They go back a look at cameras and if indeed something was stolen it gets reported to the police. Same with self check outs. It's on camera and obvious thievery gets reported. They don't exactly get away with it but they don't get brought to justice immediately either. I don't know how or what happens on the police side of it. 🤷‍♂️

I agree tho things are wonky compared to the world we grew up in.

Lot of this is brought about too by the lib city/states that give the criminal more rights than the victim.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, iowaboy1965 said:

Also there are far to many who if they are injured would sue or their families would. Then you have the thief who more than likely would sue somebody be it the store or employee if they were injured. So from a liability stand point the store is better off (up to a point anyway)  letting them go and calling the cops.

Lawyers….. I wonder if they could change the law so that criminals can’t sue their targets if they get injured while committing a crime.  

Seems logical so it will never happen.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Mudfly said:

Lawyers….. I wonder if they could change the law so that criminals can’t sue their targets if they get injured while committing a crime.  

Seems logical so it will never happen.

 

  Suing is the business of a fair amount of lawyers.  They are never going to do anything to restrict their own business.  This is how we got to the point we are at in terms of society melting down.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, iowaboy1965 said:

Jake I believe the thinking is the stores can not instruct their employees to confront thieves because if there is an altercation and the employee is seriously hurt then the store is liable for their injuries. Also there are far to many who if they are injured would sue or their families would. Then you have the thief who more than likely would sue somebody be it the store or employee if they were injured. So from a liability stand point the store is better off (up to a point anyway)  letting them go and calling the cops.

Son works for Walmart and they tell them not to confront people. Same with asking to see a receipt for any thing at the door not in a bag. If customer says no thats the end of it. They go back a look at cameras and if indeed something was stolen it gets reported to the police. Same with self check outs. It's on camera and obvious thievery gets reported. They don't exactly get away with it but they don't get brought to justice immediately either. I don't know how or what happens on the police side of it. 🤷‍♂️

I agree tho things are wonky compared to the world we grew up in.

Lot of this is brought about too by the lib city/states that give the criminal more rights than the victim.

  In the case of self check out businesses bring any losses upon themselves.  People that would never be tempted to take something with a cashier watching them but will play to bend the rules if they think nobody is watching them.. Kind of like locks keep the honest people honest.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mr. Roper said:

Do you reckon they knew how to use the tools or just going to sell or trade them ?

anyone that goes down after one knuckle sandwich couldn't handle them😁 ......I expect they would pawn them off in Toronto, if you look closely at the culprits they ain't farmboys

Link to comment
Share on other sites

thank goodness they didnt run over her and they didnt have guns it could have been way worse - thankful the family business got their things back and the thieves were caught

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, iowaboy1965 said:

Jake I believe the thinking is the stores can not instruct their employees to confront thieves because if there is an altercation and the employee is seriously hurt then the store is liable for their injuries. Also there are far to many who if they are injured would sue or their families would. Then you have the thief who more than likely would sue somebody be it the store or employee if they were injured. So from a liability stand point the store is better off (up to a point anyway)  letting them go and calling the cops.

Son works for Walmart and they tell them not to confront people. Same with asking to see a receipt for any thing at the door not in a bag. If customer says no thats the end of it. They go back a look at cameras and if indeed something was stolen it gets reported to the police. Same with self check outs. It's on camera and obvious thievery gets reported. They don't exactly get away with it but they don't get brought to justice immediately either. I don't know how or what happens on the police side of it. 🤷‍♂️

I agree tho things are wonky compared to the world we grew up in.

Lot of this is brought about too by the lib city/states that give the criminal more rights than the victim.

Ioway, I think with your explanation I agree somewhat through out, but the main answer to all this crap is your final sentence.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...