Jump to content

Biden's not so clean energy transition


Recommended Posts

18 hours ago, Ian Beale said:

Yes generations to come will be dealing with it 

 

"Luckily, the Institute for Safety Problems of Nuclear Power Plants (ISPNPP) scientists say the growth in neutron activity is low enough that they still have a few years to figure out their next steps and keep the rain out."

"Because the site is far too poisonous for humans, they might build a robot that can walk around and spray neutron-stanching chemicals on the affected areas."

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 53
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

If the debate was about clean energy, and not fictitious climate change, Nuclear would be at the top of the list.

Today's WSJ Op-Ed page has a good illustration of the costs, both environmentally and monetarily, and impracticability,  of he transition proposed to a non-fossil fuel economy. The major problem

Please put one near me.  I would welcome the jobs and the tax base into the community.   Diablo Canyon in California was right on the coast and was touted as one of the last pristine tidal stre

Posted Images

Saw this 

 

FB_IMG_1620990713121.jpg

  • Sad 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
On 5/12/2021 at 11:28 AM, Cdfarabaugh said:

Everybody here spouting about nuclear and how safe it is.......we cant even keep a gas pipeline secure as we just witnessed.  Too much liability and risk from nuclear, I dont care what anyone says.  Theres 1,000 sq miles that will likely never be lived on again from Chernobyl.  TMI would have pretty much wiped us out here in PA had they not gotten lucky.  Nobody can find easy, safe, or acceptable solutions to spent fuel either.......its just another can that's kicked down the road 

 

When nuclear was first used, they said it would be so cheap that meters would not be needed on your house. Oooooooooooooops, another statement that failed to come true.

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 5/12/2021 at 9:28 AM, Cdfarabaugh said:

Everybody here spouting about nuclear and how safe it is.......we cant even keep a gas pipeline secure as we just witnessed.  Too much liability and risk from nuclear, I dont care what anyone says.  Theres 1,000 sq miles that will likely never be lived on again from Chernobyl.  TMI would have pretty much wiped us out here in PA had they not gotten lucky.  Nobody can find easy, safe, or acceptable solutions to spent fuel either.......its just another can that's kicked down the road 

 

Tmi has 0 injuries or deaths or real neg results did it? 

 

If people think waste is a issue they dont study Nuke tech.  The ability to re re re use rod and even re run waste is all in grasp

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...