Jump to content

Bet her dad is proud


Recommended Posts

Wife and I were 50 when we married.

Her family was anti-gun.

Today they all carry.

Taught wife the basics and she bought a 32 mag revolver.

Simple gun.

She asked last night for a refresher course.

Made me smile.

  • Like 10
Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a Niece who is a Captain in the US Army. She is on active duty and has many Soldiers working for her.  Qualified in all weapons recognized by the Geneva Convention.

She graduated in the top 10% of her class at West Point, She just does the job she signed up for!

  • Like 8
  • Thanks 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, oleman said:

I have a Niece who is a Captain in the US Army. She is on active duty and has many Soldiers working for her.  Qualified in all weapons recognized by the Geneva Convention.

She graduated in the top 10% of her class a West Point, She just does the job she signed up for!

I'd have my chest sticking out sir!

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites
38 minutes ago, MTO said:

Wife and I were 50 when we married.

Her family was anti-gun.

Today they all carry.

Taught wife the basics and she bought a 32 mag revolver.

Simple gun.

She asked last night for a refresher course.

Made me smile.

My wife and her family weren't anti gun per say as dad in law had a shotgun and a .22. when we got married in 1997. But they sure leaned toward guns were the killers. Same thing on this end. Complete turn around. Dad in law just bought a pistol. My three brothers in laws and their families. Same thing. Great to see.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Speaking of proud dads, our new Representative skipped the inauguration to go to his daughter's basketball game.

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, FarmerFixEmUp said:

Speaking of proud dad's, our new Representative skipped the inauguration to go to his daughter's basketball game.

 

That is great to see! I graduated high school with Randy. And what is neat, his daughter and my daughter graduated together. And his son and my son graduated together last year. He is truly a great guy. My daughter is in nursing school now. But I wouldn't care if she was in prison I wouldn't have attended the inauguration. 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

There are a few great ones in Washington but the vast majority falls into this catagory:

Charley Reese's final column for the Orlando Sentinel... He has been a journalist for 49 years.

He is retiring and this is HIS LAST COLUMN.

 Be sure to read the Tax List at the end.  This is about as clear and easy to understand as it can be. The article below is completely neutral, neither anti-republican or anti-democrat. Charlie Reese, a retired reporter for the Orlando Sentinel, has hit the nail directly on the head, defining clearly who it is that in the final analysis must assume responsibility for the judgments made that impact each one of us every day. It's a short but good read. Worth the time. Worth remembering!

545 vs. 300,000,000 People  -By Charlie Reese

Politicians are the only people in the world who create problems and then campaign against them. Have you ever wondered, if both the Democrats and the Republicans are against deficits, WHY do we have deficits?

Have you ever wondered, if all the politicians are against inflation and high taxes, WHY do we have inflation and high taxes?

You and I don't propose a federal budget. The President does.

You and I don't have the Constitutional authority to vote on appropriations. The House of Representatives does.

You and I don't write the tax code, Congress does.

You and I don't set fiscal policy, Congress does.

You and I don't control monetary policy, the Federal Reserve Bank does.

One hundred senators, 435 congressmen, one President, and nine Supreme Court justices equates to 545 human beings out of the 300 million are directly, legally, morally, and individually responsible for the domestic problems that plague this country.

I excluded the members of the Federal Reserve Board because that problem was created by the Congress. In 1913, Congress delegated its Constitutional duty to provide a sound currency to a federally chartered, but private, central bank.

I excluded all the special interests and lobbyists for a sound reason. They have no legal authority. They have no ability to coerce a senator, a congressman, or a President to do one cotton-picking thing. I don't care if they offer a politician $1 million dollars in cash. The politician has the power to accept or reject it. No matter what the lobbyist promises, it is the legislator's responsibility to determine how he votes.

Those 545 human beings spend much of their energy convincing you that what they did is not their fault. They cooperate in this common con regardless of party.

What separates a politician from a normal human being is an excessive amount of gall. No normal human being would have the gall of a Speaker, who stood up and criticized the President for creating deficits. The President can only propose a budget. He cannot force the Congress to accept it.

The Constitution, which is the supreme law of the land, gives sole responsibility to the House of Representatives for originating and approving appropriations and taxes. The speaker of the Housand fellow House members, not the President, can approve any budget they want. If the President vetoes it, they can pass over his veto, if they agree to.

It seems inconceivable to me that a nation of 300 million cannot replace 545 people who stand convicted -- by present facts -- of incompetence and irresponsibility. I can't think of a single domestic problem that is not traceable directly to those 545 people. When you fully grasp the plain truth that 545 people exercise the power of the federal government, then it must follow that what exists is what they want to exist.

If the tax code is unfair, it's because they want it unfair.

If the budget is in the red, it's because they want it in the red.

 If the Army & Marines are in Iraq and Afghanistan it's because they want them in Iraq and Afghanistan ...

 If they do not receive social security but are on an elite retirement plan not available to the people, it's because they want it that way.

 There are no insoluble government problems.

 Do not let these 545 people shift the blame to bureaucrats, whom they hire and whose jobs they can abolish; to lobbyists, whose gifts and advice they can reject; to regulators, to whom they give the power to regulate and from whom they can take this power. Above all, do not let them con you into the belief that there exists disembodied mystical forces like "the economy," "inflation," or "politics" that prevent them from doing what they take an oath to do.

 

Those 545 people, and they alone, are responsible.

 They, and they alone, have the power.

 They, and they alone, should be held accountable by the people who are their bosses. Provided the voters have the gumption to manage their own employees...

 We should vote all of them out of office and clean up their mess!

 What you do with this article now that you have read it... is up to you.  This might be funny if it weren't so true. 

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 5
Link to post
Share on other sites

I would prefer if they carried concealed. I think it's much safer in a bad situation as someone who has bad intentions would try to take out someone they know is carrying first .

Glad they cary anyways

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...