#11
Posted 26 April 2012 - 11:46 AM
If you want a car that looks like a pickup buy a chevy, want to hang out at the shop buy a 6.0 liter Ford.
7.3 Fords are good trucks, and if you get the right year of Chevy the engines are pretty good (can't remember the year, 07' or something, after they fixed the injector problems,and before they added more emissions crap.
They are all good for one thing or another, Fords are midway in comfort between the smooth ride of a Chevy and the rough ride of a Dodge.
The Cummins is the best engine IMO, but the right year of Duramax is a good one too, 6.0 liters are crap.
Don't know much about the 6.4, but it can't be as bad as a 6.0
1 TD14A
3 TD9s
And some TD14 street tracks and chains and sprockets I'd like to sell.
International Harvester crawler group on Facebook http://www.facebook....57096181046179/
#12
Posted 26 April 2012 - 07:23 PM
Like others have said already, they get poor mileage until the DPF is removed.
I would ask the owner how he used the truck with a tune/programer and not totally avoid those trucks.
Personally, I'm installing a Cummins in my 2004 SuperDuty
Thomas Jefferson, 1799
#14
Posted 26 April 2012 - 09:46 PM
The 6.4 is a hot rod when tuned! Delete the dpf and get a tuner that will support that mod. Fuel economy will go up greatly with those mods. Yes it will cost about a grand but if you plan on keeping it awhile it will pay off in the long run. Look for milage to go from 10ish upto 16-18ish depending on driving style. I wouldn't expect a 6.4 to go a million miles like a 7.3 but 400-500k would be a reasonable expectation. Also block off or delete the egr coolers. The egr cooler is not as big of a problem on the 6.4 as it was on the 6.0 but I'm still leary of them on anything!
Couldn't have said it any better. Any truck built after 2007 will need all the emissions crap removed to make them a long lasting reliable truck. The 6.4 if the best to choose from. Guys are pushing 1000 hp on a stock bottom end. You won't do that with any other platform including the new ford 6.7.
#15
Posted 26 April 2012 - 10:09 PM
66 706D NF FH,59 560D,54 TD-6(sold),Model 46 baler,Model 76 combine,Model 155 Spreader,Model 56 planter,100 FH mower,463 FH cult(2),782 Cub Cadet(2),682 INTERNATIONAL Cub Cadet,1650 cubcadet w/50A mower and 1A(?) rototiller,311 FH plows(3),FH subsoiler,Fast hitch carry-all,10'8" FH disk,FH post hole digger(needs ring gear),FH landside hitch(I think) and looking for more!
Member Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineer's and Trainmen Division 757
UT Martin '87
"Get there the firstis' with the mostis'"Nathan Bedford Forrest
Sire of:2011-2012 PA State FFA Association Sentinel (TLC)
Scars are Tattoos with better stories
#16
Posted 27 April 2012 - 09:09 AM
Thanks
Jason
#17
Posted 27 April 2012 - 02:12 PM
#18
Posted 27 April 2012 - 02:18 PM
My point is, while the emmisions designs have been a PITA for the last 5 years, with DEF, they might now be getting everything straightened out, I think the power and efficiency might be coming back, we might be able to safely consider buying a new diesel P/U again.
One other thing, all I need is a 1/2 ton, I've been thinking about a Ford EcoBoost F150, anybody here have any experience or problems with one yet?
#19
Posted 27 April 2012 - 05:02 PM
Rather interesting thing I'd like to share, I haven't seen the comparison on the diesel pickups, but in the Ag / Construction, On-Highway world, these "11 & newer DEF (diesel exhaust fluid) engines are really nice. The DEF has allowed the manufacturers to go back to older tier II designs, bring back the power, efficiency, and still beat the NOX standards. Working at a Cat dealer that also handles AGCO, we are getting to see the differences in design between trying to comply with and with out going DEF - the DEF SISU's are relatively simple, non cluttered engines, you can still see the sides of the engine block, where as the Cats - working to comply without DEF are a nightmare of turbos, tubes, fuel lines and wires, some of the new equipment "flat rates" a valve adjust at 14 hours!
My point is, while the emmisions designs have been a PITA for the last 5 years, with DEF, they might now be getting everything straightened out, I think the power and efficiency might be coming back, we might be able to safely consider buying a new diesel P/U again.
One other thing, all I need is a 1/2 ton, I've been thinking about a Ford EcoBoost F150, anybody here have any experience or problems with one yet?
I agree with you on the CAT's. The one thing I find funny is the 4.4, and the 6.6 engines. Everytime you crack one of the fuel lines from the fuel manifold to injector you have to replace them. At close to $100 a piece that is nice add on when you replace injectors.
As for the EcoBoost Fords I haven't heard one bad thing about them. I have test drove one, and I loved it. We bought a new Explorer in 2011 nice SUV, but I really wanted the wife to get a Crew Cab F150 EcoBoost, but she said it was too BIG. Whatever she wants I guess. Happy wife, Happy life.
Jason
#20
Posted 27 April 2012 - 08:34 PM











